NATURA 2000 PRO ŽIVOT
NATURA 2000 FOR LIFE
česky | english
  • About the Project
    • Actions in Time
    • Protected Areas
    • The Natura 2000 Network
    • Protected Areas Management
      • Forest grazing
      • Coppicing
    • Benefits of Protected Areas
      • Case studies
    • Education
      • Module: Natura 2000
      • Module: Communication skills
      • Module: Natura 2000 sites management
      • Module: Ecosystem Services Evaluation
      • E-learning
    • Publications and leaflets
    • Job Opportunities
    • Public Procurement
  • Actions in Time
  • Project Team
  • Photo Gallery and Videos
  • NPES
    • Members
  • Contacts

  • About the Project
    • Actions in Time
    • Protected Areas
    • The Natura 2000 Network
    • Protected Areas Management
      • Forest grazing
      • Coppicing
    • Benefits of Protected Areas
      • Case studies
    • Education
      • Module: Natura 2000
      • Module: Communication skills
      • Module: Natura 2000 sites management
      • Module: Ecosystem Services Evaluation
      • E-learning
    • Publications and leaflets
    • Job Opportunities
    • Public Procurement
  • Actions in Time
  • Project Team
  • Photo Gallery and Videos
  • NPES
    • Members
  • Contacts

česky | english
  • About the Project
    • Actions in Time
    • Protected Areas
    • The Natura 2000 Network
    • Protected Areas Management
      • Forest grazing
      • Coppicing
    • Benefits of Protected Areas
      • Case studies
    • Education
      • Module: Natura 2000
      • Module: Communication skills
      • Module: Natura 2000 sites management
      • Module: Ecosystem Services Evaluation
      • E-learning
    • Publications and leaflets
    • Job Opportunities
    • Public Procurement
  • Actions in Time
  • Project Team
  • Photo Gallery and Videos
  • NPES
    • Members
  • Contacts

  • About the Project
    • Actions in Time
    • Protected Areas
    • The Natura 2000 Network
    • Protected Areas Management
      • Forest grazing
      • Coppicing
    • Benefits of Protected Areas
      • Case studies
    • Education
      • Module: Natura 2000
      • Module: Communication skills
      • Module: Natura 2000 sites management
      • Module: Ecosystem Services Evaluation
      • E-learning
    • Publications and leaflets
    • Job Opportunities
    • Public Procurement
  • Actions in Time
  • Project Team
  • Photo Gallery and Videos
  • NPES
    • Members
  • Contacts
česky | english

  • About the Project
    • Actions in Time
    • Protected Areas
    • The Natura 2000 Network
    • Protected Areas Management
      • Forest grazing
      • Coppicing
    • Benefits of Protected Areas
      • Case studies
    • Education
      • Module: Natura 2000
      • Module: Communication skills
      • Module: Natura 2000 sites management
      • Module: Ecosystem Services Evaluation
      • E-learning
    • Publications and leaflets
    • Job Opportunities
    • Public Procurement
  • Actions in Time
  • Project Team
  • Photo Gallery and Videos
  • NPES
    • Members
  • Contacts
česky | english
  • Home
  • News and Media
  • Actions in time
  • Who manages Natura 2000: Discover the role of national parks

Who manages Natura 2000: Discover the role of national parks

6. 4. 2023  | Actions in time

National parks are areas with predominant occurrence of natural ecosystems or ecosystems that have been slightly altered by humans, so it is not surprising that all national parks in the Czech Republic (Krkonoše, České Švýcarsko, Podyjí and Šumava) also overlap with the area of Natura 2000. For these sites, as well as for the Šumava PLA and the Labské pískovce PLA, the national park administrations are also the nature protection authorities (NPAs). The NPAs are responsible for the performance of state administration – these are mainly acts related to the planning of management, implementation of management, marking of boundaries and issuing administrative decisions concerning activities and interventions in the respective area.

 

Figure 1: Which of the Czech Republic´s national parks is the oldest, youngest, largest and smallest one?

 

National Parks versus the NCA as far as finances are concerned

National parks are contributory organisations, i.e. institutions with a certain degree of their own subjectivity, and this is also one of the main differences from the NCA, whose activities were described in detail in the previous article.  Ultimately, this has a significant impact on fundraising and the actual administration of activities in the area. National parks receive financial contributions both from the state and through their own economic activity. The largest share of their own funding comes from timber sales, as national park administrations manage forest land that is owned by the state. These funds are further used to run the administration and manage the national park. In contrast, within the landscape protected areas, the company Forests of the Czech Republic manages in this way, and this state-owned company also uses the financial profit from the sale of timber. The PLA administrations, i.e. the NCA, do not manage the forestry here and therefore do not receive any profit from the sale of timber, however, as the competent NPA, they comment on activities and documents related to (forestry) management, including forest management plans.

 

Table: National park administrations as nature protection authorities and Natura 2000 network

 

Finances – an essential prerequisite for fulfilling legal obligations

Are the state-budget contributions and the national parks´ own economic activity enough to ensure comprehensive management not only of the Natura 2000 network? Unfortunately – as in the case of other entities implementing nature management, the answer is straightforward – they are not. Operational funding is not sufficient to ensure the management and the parks use available programmes and subsidies. These are mainly Landscape Management Programme, Support for the Restoration of Natural Landscape Functions, OP Environment, or LIFE programmes, which partially compensate the deficit of operational funding and thus ensure sufficient management. The degree of using the individual resources (i.e. the state-budget contribution, own resources or programmes and subsidies) and the redistribution of funds for Natura 2000 vary from one national park to another.

Podyjí National Park – horse grazing is co-financed by the Landscape Management Programme (Photo: Kateřina Španihelová)

In general, however, national park administrations are facing a shortage of personnel and resources to finance long-term, larger-scale activities. To a great extent, operational funding is used for the running of the administration itself, and of course for nature management, the costliest of which is, by definition, the management of the forest-free areas. The operational funds also often pay for environmental education and other work with the public in general, including publicity. It is possible to state that, in comparison, external (project) funding is most frequently used for nature management in the parks (again, the largest item is the forest-free area). It is clear that recurring management (mostly management of grassland habitats – clearing, regular mowing / grazing, supporting rare or endangered species by disturbance, etc.), is costly, and national parks also differ in whether they use more operational or programme funding for this type of management (similar to monitoring or research).

Šumava National Park – the river Vltava near Nová Pec hosts many rare bird species (Photo: Kateřina Španihelová)

As all of the Czech Republic´s national parks share a national border with their counterparts, there is great potential for cross-border cooperation, with financial opportunities coming mainly from the EU´s Interreg programmes. These programmes also appear to be relatively unchanged for the next years, while the widely used OP Environment, which currently funds a significant number of projects, may undergo some changes (especially in the EU funding allocation). The question remains to what extent it is a systematic solution to finance legal obligations from EU sources. Such a model appears to be unsustainable and susceptible to the opportunities of the moment, staff capacity, and it is also unstable and unpredictable in the long term. For instance, the exemption of national parks from paying income tax or other instruments create room for discussion. In any case, the systematic management of such unique areas should be the subject of much wider debate and attention in the future.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Sdílet

Související

18. 12. 2024

One Nature Project Sparks Interest: Estonian Colleagues Reach Out for Collaboration


Celý článek
Obrázek z dokumentu Hodnoty přírody

Obrázek z dokumentu Hodnoty přírody

16. 12. 2024

The new documentary Values of Nature introduces the concept of ecosystem services evaluation


Celý článek
16. 12. 2024

WHO MANAGES NATURA 2000: Military district administrations


Celý článek
  • About the Project
  • Protected Areas
  • The Natura 2000 Network
  • Protected Areas Management
    • Forest grazing
    • Coppicing
  • Benefits of Protected Areas
    • Case studies
  • Education
    • Module: Natura 2000
    • Module: Communication skills
    • Module: Natura 2000 sites management
    • Module: Ecosystem Services Evaluation
    • E-learning
  • Publications and leaflets
  • Job Opportunities
  • Public Procurement

Management of the Natura 2000 protected areas benefits both nature and people.

Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic   www.mzp.cz

Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic   www.nature.cz

Charles University Environment Centre   www.czp.cuni.cz

CzechGlobe – Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences   www.czechglobe.cz

Biology Centre of the CAS, Soil & Water Research Infrastructure   www.soilwater.cz


Declaration of Accessibility Site map
Cookie Policy (EU) Privacy Policy Statement
Who manages Natura 2000: Discover the role of national parks
Who manages Natura 2000: Discover the role of national parks
Who manages Natura 2000: Discover the role of national parks

One Nature project (LIFE-IP:N2K: Revisited, LIFE17/IPE/CZ/000005) was supported by the European Union's LIFE financial tool.


The data and information published on this website reflect the opinion or statement of the Czech Ministry of the Environment and the project partners only. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.

© 2020 Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic | All rights reserved.
Programmed by: Xcreative s.r.o. | Webdesign by: 2123design s.r.o.
    English
    • Czech
    • English
      Manage Cookie Consent
      To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
      Functional Always active
      The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
      Předvolby
      Technické uložení nebo přístup je nezbytný pro legitimní účel ukládání preferencí, které nejsou požadovány odběratelem nebo uživatelem.
      Statistics
      The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. Technické uložení nebo přístup, který se používá výhradně pro anonymní statistické účely. Bez předvolání, dobrovolného plnění ze strany vašeho Poskytovatele internetových služeb nebo dalších záznamů od třetí strany nelze informace, uložené nebo získané pouze pro tento účel, obvykle použít k vaší identifikaci.
      Marketingové údaje
      Marketingové údaje nám pomohou zjistit, která reklama pro Vás byla zajímavá. Prozrazují nám také, které kampaně na sociálních sítích byly úspěšné a které ne.
      Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
      View preferences
      {title} {title} {title}